Novel Genes and Genetic Variants Associated with Production Traits in Australorp Chickens
Article Sidebar
PDF downloads: 52
XML-Crossref downloads: 23
XML-DOAJ downloads: 17
Crossref Citations: 0
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The Australorp chicken, known for its exceptional egg production and adaptability, is a valuable genetic resource for the poultry industry. However, the molecular basis underlying their distinctive traits remains poorly understood. The present study aimed to identify novel genes and genetic variants associated with key production traits in Australorp chickens by performing a comprehensive comparative genomic analysis combined with an in silico genome-wide association study (GWAS).
Materials and methods: Whole-genome sequencing data from 12 Australorp chickens were compared with data from four other breeds, including ten Rhode Island Red, eight Leghorn, ten Plymouth Rock, and six Red Jungle Fowl. Quality control and preprocessing were applied to ensure high-quality genomic data for downstream analyses. Comparative genomic analysis revealed several breed-specific genetic variants in Australorp chickens, affecting 50 genes functionally involved in metabolic and reproductive pathways, and 30 genes with reduced or altered functional annotations compared to other breeds. Principal component analysis revealed clear genetic differentiation among Australorp chickens, confirming their distinct genetic structure.
Results: In silico GWAS identified significant associations between novel candidate genes (GENE 42, GENE 89) and key production traits, including egg production, egg weight, and disease resistance. Functional annotation revealed that these genes, identified in Australorp chickens (Gallus gallus), are mainly involved in metabolic processes, immune response, and reproductive pathways. Notably, several previously unreported genes were discovered that may contribute to the Australorp's superior egg-laying ability and disease resistance in chickens.
Conclusion: The present findings offered new insights into the genetic basis of economically important traits in poultry and laid a foundation for marker-assisted selection in breeding programs. The novel genes identified in the present study served as potential targets for improving production traits in commercial chicken breeds and helped advance understanding of avian genomics and evolution.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Tixier Boichard M, Leenstra F, Flock DK, Hocking PM, and Weigend S. A century of poultry genetics. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2012; 68(2): 307 321. DOI: 10.1017/S0043933912000360
Fulton JE. Advances in genomics of poultry. Anim Front. 2020; 10(1): 53 60. DOI: 10.2527/af.2011-0028
Crowley TM, Haring VR, Burggraaf S, and Moore RJ. Application of chicken microarrays for gene expression analysis in other avian species. BMC Genom. 2009; 10(2): S3. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-S2-S3
Chiarelotto M, Restrepo JCPS, Lorin HEF, and Damaceno FM. Composting organic waste from the broiler production chain: A perspective for the circular economy. J Clean Prod. 2021; 329: 129717. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129717
Roberts V. British poultry standards. 6th ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. Available at: https://download.e-bookshelf.de/download/0000/5989/97/L-G-0000598997-0002363439.pdf
Oh Y, Lee WJ, Hur JK, Song WJ, Lee YJ, Kim H, et al. Expansion of the prime editing modality with Cas9 from Francisella novicida. Genome Biol. 2022; 23(1): 92. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-022-02644-8
Bortoluzzi C, Crooijmans RPMA, Bosse M, Hiemstra SJ, Groenen MA, and Megens HJ. Effects of recent breeding preference changes on maintaining traditional Dutch chicken genomic diversity. Heredity. 2018; 121(6): 564 578. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-018-0072-3
Dunn IC, Joseph NT, Bain M, Edmond A, Wilson PW, Milona P, et al. Polymorphisms in eggshell organic matrix genes associated with eggshell quality measurements in pedigree Rhode Island Red hens. Anim Genet. 2009; 40(1): 110-114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01794.x
Fleming DS, Koltes JE, Markey AD, Schmidt CJ, Ashwell CM, Rothschild MF, et al. Genomic analysis of Ugandan and Rwandan chicken ecotypes using a 600k genotyping array. BMC Genom. 2016; 17(1): 407. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2711-5
Georges M, Charlier C, and Hayes B. Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement. Nat Rev Genet. 2019; 20(3): 135 156. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-018-0082-2
Johnson PA, Stephens CS, and Giles JR. The domestic chicken: Causes and consequences of an egg a day. Poult Sci. 2015; 94(4): 616-820. DOI: 10.3382/ps/peu083
Korte A, and Farlow A. Advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: A review. Plant Methods. 2013; 9(1): 29. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4811-9-29
Li Z, Zheng M, Abdalla BA, Zhang Z, Xu Z, Ye Q, et al. Genome-wide association study of aggressive behaviour in chicken. Sci Rep. 2016; 6(1): 30981. DOI: 10.1038/srep30981
Liao R, Zhang X, Chen Q, Wang Z, Wang Q, Yang C, et al. Genome-wide association study reveals novel variants for growth and egg traits in Dongxiang blue shelled and White Leghorn chickens. Anim Genet. 2016; 47(5): 588 596. DOI: 10.1111/age.12456
Liu Z, Yang N, Yan Y, Li G, Liu A, Wu G, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of egg production performance across the whole laying period. BMC Genet. 2019; 20(1): 67. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-019-0771-7
Moreira GCM, Boschiero C, Cesar ASM, Reecy JM, Godoy TF, Trevisoli PA, et al. A genome-wide association study reveals novel genomic regions and positional candidate genes for fat deposition in broiler chickens. BMC Genomics. 2018; 19(1): 374. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4779-6
Muir WM, Wong GKS, Zhang Y, Wang J, Groenen MAM, Crooijmans RPMA, et al. Genome wide assessment of worldwide chicken SNP genetic diversity indicates significant absence of rare alleles in commercial breeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105(45): 17312 17317. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806569105
Nys Y, Gautron J, Garcia Ruiz JM, and Hincke MT. Avian eggshell mineralization: biochemical and functional characterization of matrix proteins. CR Palevol. 2004; 3(6-7): 549 562. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2004.08.002
Kumar M, Dahiya SP, Ratwan P, Sheoran N, Sandeep Kumar, and Kumar N. Assessment of egg quality and biochemical parameters of Aseel and Kadaknath indigenous chicken breeds of India under backyard poultry farming. Poult Sci. 2022; 101(2):101589. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101589
Pértille F, Moreira GC, Zanella R, Nunes JR, Boschiero C, Rovadoscki GA, et al. Genome-wide association study for performance traits in chickens using genotype by sequencing approach. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 41748. DOI: 10.1038/srep41748
Psifidi A, Banos G, Matika O, Desta TT, Bettridge J, Hume DA, et al. Genome-wide association studies of immune, disease and production traits in indigenous chicken ecotypes. Genet Sel Evol. 2016; 48(1): 74. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0252-7
Qanbari S, and Simianer H. Mapping signatures of positive selection in livestock genomes. Livest Sci. 2014; 166: 133 143. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.003
Rowland K, Wolc A, Gallardo RA, Kelly T, Zhou H, Dekkers JC, et al. Genetic analysis of a commercial egg laying line challenged with Newcastle disease virus. Front Genet. 2018; 9: 326. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00326
Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, Meadows JR, Sherwood E, Webster MT, et al. Whole genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature. 2010; 464(7288): 587 591. DOI: 10.1038/nature08832
Saelao P, Wang Y, Chanthavixay G, Gallardo RA, Wolc A, Dekkers JC, et al. Genomic regions affecting response to Newcastle disease virus under heat stress in layer chickens. Genes. 2019; 10(1): 61. DOI: 10.3390/genes10010061
Saleem F, Ameer A, Star Shirko B, Keating C, Gundogdu O, Ijaz UZ, et al. Dataset of 569 metagenome assembled genomes from caeca of multiple chicken breeds. Data Brief. 2024; 54: 110552. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110552
Tam V, Patel N, Turcotte M, Bossé Y, Paré G, and Meyre D. Benefits and limitations of genome wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2019; 20(8): 467 484. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1
Tixier Boichard M, Bed’hom B, and Rognon X. Chicken domestication: From archaeology to genomics. C R Biol. 2011; 334(3): 197 204. DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.012
Wang WH, Wang JY, Zhang T, Wang Y, Zhang Y, and Han K. Genome-wide association study of growth traits in Jinghai Yellow chicken hens using SLAF-seq technology. Anim Genet. 2019; 50(2): 175-176. DOI: 10.1111/age.12346
Warren WC, Hillier LW, Tomlinson C, Minx P, Kremitzki M, Graves T, Cheng HH. A new chicken genome assembly provides insight into avian genome structure. G3. 2017; 7(1): 109 117. DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.035923
Volkova NA, Romanov MN, Dzhagaev AY, Larionova PV, Volkova LA, Abdelmanova AS, et al. Genome-wide association studies and candidate genes for egg production traits in layers from an F2 crossbred population produced using two divergently selected chicken breeds, Russian White and Cornish White. Genes. 2025; 16(5): 583. DOI: 10.3390/genes16050583
Wolc A, Arango J, Settar P, O’Sullivan NP, Olori VE, White IMS, et al. Genetic parameters of egg defects in layer chickens. Poult Sci. 2012; 91(6): 1292-1298. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-02130
Zhao QB, Liao RR, Sun H, Zhang Z, Wang QS, and Yang CS. Identifying genetic differences between dongxiang Blue-Shelled and White Leghorn chickens using sequencing data. G3. 2018; 8(2): 469-476. DOI: 10.1534/g3.117.300382
Li XL, He WL, Wang ZB, and Xu TS. Effects of Chinese herbal mixture on performance, egg quality and blood biochemical parameters of laying hens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2016; 100(6): 1041-1049. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12473
Benjamini Y, and Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995; 57(1): 289-300. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x